// Showcase

When the Control Loop Sabotages Its Own Measurement

For a wavefront measurement with 0.5 nm sensitivity, practically nothing can move during exposure – not even because of the control loop itself.

Sensors & Metrology

01Starting point

For a wavefront measurement with 0.5 nm sensitivity, practically nothing can move during exposure – not even because of the control loop itself. A six-axis positioner holding a position isn't sitting still: actuators, control loops, gain – and that's exactly where it can become its own source of disturbance. "The axes are stable enough" was the original claim on the table. Except: how do you actually verify that?

02Approach

Pretty pragmatically: build an interferometer, look at the fringe pattern, measure the contrast. In four configurations – measuring head close, measuring head far, on the positioner, on the component plate. We didn't estimate the contrast, we calculated it using a min/max analysis on a 2000 × 10-pixel strip. Plus six measurement series with the control loop switched off and six with it switched on – reproducible and comparable.

03Result

A number instead of a guess: 29.8% average fringe contrast with the control loop off, 21.5% with it on – a loss of 8.3 percentage points, or 28% relative, and that in every single one of the six series. The reassuring part: the spread within a series stays practically the same in both cases, at around 0.84%. The control loop doesn't make the measurement chaotic, it just makes it predictably worse – and something predictable can be worked around without touching the mechanics.

What's inside

A test procedure for acceptance testing in four configurations, a solid contrast figure instead of a gut feeling, and derived from that a small but effective tweak to the control software: the interferometric exposure is now timed so it doesn't coincide with an active control loop cycle. Pure software, no extra hardware – and only possible because we knew the effect was systematic, not random.

And what happened next

A claim that was hard to verify became a repeatable test procedure with a number in the acceptance report. And because the interferometer is built entirely from the measurement bench's own components, the machine got a built-in self-test as a bonus – one that can be repeated any time, for example after a service.

Get in touch

We are ready for new challenges

You bring the challenge. We develop the solution. From the first idea through concept and development to the validated machine, we guide your project.